An observational study of academic working hours has identified large differences in how researchers around the world manage their work-life balance.
QUT’s Professor Adrian Barnett led the research which examined more than 49,000 manuscript and 76,000 peer review online submissions to The BMJ and The BMJ Open, measuring whether the submissions were made on weekends, national holidays or late at night.
The study is published in the Christmas edition of The BMJ, which is a special issue of light-hearted studies of health.
“Clear and consistent differences were seen between countries,” Professor Barnett said.
“Chinese researchers most often worked at weekends and after midnight, whereas researchers in Scandinavian countries, which have a greater focus on work-life balance, were more likely to submit their papers during 9 to 5 on weekdays.”
“The differences between countries suggest that a ‘culture of overwork’ is a literal thing, and not just a figure of speech,” Professor Barnett said.
China, which is known to have a hard-working academic culture, was the notable leader on the table of weekend workers, both for submitting manuscripts and peer reviews to both journals in the study.
India, Denmark and Norway were the countries in which academics were least likely to work on weekends.
“Australian researchers were in the middle of the pack for most outcomes, and so were never the worst nor the best,” Professor Barnett said
Professor Barnett said there were limitations to the study.
The study recorded when people submitted their papers but did not identify when the academics spent the hours in writing those papers. Other limitations included the possibility that some academics submitted their papers while travelling away from their usual time zones, and that the practices of health and medical researchers who write for BMJ may not be representative of all academics.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Queensland University of Technology. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Source: ScienceDaily.com
